| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
16/04/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
|
Autor : |
BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; LAVECCHIA, A.; MARCHESI, C.; MARTINEZ, S.; SILVERA, W.; CASALES, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
PEDRO HORACIO BLANCO BARRAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO MOLINA CASELLA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; ANDRES PASCUAL LAVECCHIA GONZALEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; CLAUDIA ELIZABETH MARCHESI GYERMAN, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; SEBASTIAN MARTINEZ KOPP, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; WALTER HUGO SILVERA MOTA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; LUIS ALBERTO CASALES SOSA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Evaluación avanzada de cultivares Clearfield. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2011 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
ln: INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Arroz : Resultados experimentales 2010-2011. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2011. |
|
Páginas : |
C. 6 p. 25-32 |
|
Serie : |
(INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 651) |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; CULTIVARES; FITOMEJORAMIENTO; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/9237/1/Ad-651-cap.6-p.25-32.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00725naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1030469
005 2018-04-16
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBLANCO, P.H.
245 $aEvaluación avanzada de cultivares Clearfield.
260 $c2011
300 $aC. 6 p. 25-32
490 $a(INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 651)
650 $aARROZ
650 $aCULTIVARES
650 $aFITOMEJORAMIENTO
650 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aMOLINA, F.
700 1 $aLAVECCHIA, A.
700 1 $aMARCHESI, C.
700 1 $aMARTINEZ, S.
700 1 $aSILVERA, W.
700 1 $aCASALES, L.
773 $tln: INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Arroz : Resultados experimentales 2010-2011. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2011.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
29/09/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/10/2017 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Poster |
|
Autor : |
BRANDARIZ, S.P.; GONZÁELZ-REYMÚNDEZ, A.; LADO, B.; QUINCKE, M.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J.; CASTRO, M.; MATUS, I.; DEL POZO, A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
BETTINA LADO LINDNER, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; JARISLAV RAMON VON ZITZEWITZ VON SALVIATI, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; MARINA CASTRO DERENYI, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Effect of using imputed missing data on QTL detection on a wheat GWAS panel. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL DE TRIGO, 2014, La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. GERMÁN, S., et al. (Org.). 1914-2014, un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela: un valioso legado para el futuro: posters; resúmenes. La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY: INIA, 2014. |
|
Páginas : |
p. 86. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
Molecular markers are an essential component of plant and animal breeding programs. One inexpensive way of obtaining molecular markers is through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is one of the NGS techniques which have been successfully used for complex genomes like wheat. A particularity of GBS is that it generates a lot of missing information which is generally imputed. Imputation is required for Genomic Prediction studies and several studies demonstrate its value. However, the effectiveness of missing data imputation for Genome-wide association (GWAS) studies has not been demonstrated. Data imputation for GWAS where one marker at a time is being studied could potentially create biased estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of using either missing or imputed data for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) detection in a wheat GWAS pannel. A set of 384 advanced lines of wheat was included in this study consisting of 186 genotypes from INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria) in Uruguay, 55 genotypes from INIA in Chile and 143 genotypes from CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo). SNPs were obtained using the Tassel-GBS Pipeline. We excluded SNPs with more than 50 % missing data and SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) more extreme than 10%. Sequence database available from the SyntheticxOpata map (synop) was used to construct the maps, obtaining a final data set with more than 18K SNPs. Missing data was handled in three different ways to create the SNP datasets used for QTL detection: 1) data not-imputed, 2) data imputed by the realized relationship matrix method multivariate normal expectation maximization (MVN-EM), and 3) data imputed by the mean. A number of QTL (either 25 or 50) with different heritability (0.2 and 0.7) were simulated on top of each dataset. The following mixed model was used to recover QTL: , where : phenotypic vector, : SNPs matrix, : unknown vector of allele effects to be estimated, : matrix that relates each measurement to population origin, : populations vector, : kinship matrix, : vector of random background polygenic effects, and : residual error. We used a liberal 0.01 significance level. The power to detect QTL was estimated for each dataset and differences among medians of QTL detection power among imputed datasets were studied using the Friedman test and non-parametric contrasts. For this purpose, methods of imputations were defined as treatments and simulation scenarios as blocks. The QTL detection power with the MVN-EM matrix was lower than with the mean imputed matrix or the no imputed matrix. No differences in QTL detection power were found between the mean imputed matrix or the no imputed matrix. Based on our results, imputing does not seem to improve QTL detection power. MenosMolecular markers are an essential component of plant and animal breeding programs. One inexpensive way of obtaining molecular markers is through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is one of the NGS techniques which have been successfully used for complex genomes like wheat. A particularity of GBS is that it generates a lot of missing information which is generally imputed. Imputation is required for Genomic Prediction studies and several studies demonstrate its value. However, the effectiveness of missing data imputation for Genome-wide association (GWAS) studies has not been demonstrated. Data imputation for GWAS where one marker at a time is being studied could potentially create biased estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of using either missing or imputed data for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) detection in a wheat GWAS pannel. A set of 384 advanced lines of wheat was included in this study consisting of 186 genotypes from INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria) in Uruguay, 55 genotypes from INIA in Chile and 143 genotypes from CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo). SNPs were obtained using the Tassel-GBS Pipeline. We excluded SNPs with more than 50 % missing data and SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) more extreme than 10%. Sequence database available from the SyntheticxOpata map (synop) was used to construct the maps, obtaining a final data set with more than 18K SNPs. Mi... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
GBS; GENOMIC PREDICTION; GENOMIC WIDE ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPING BY SEQUENCING; GWAS; MARCADORES MOLECULARES; MULTIVARIATE NORMAL EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION; MVN-EM; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NGS; QTL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI DETECTION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; SNPs; TRITICUM. |
|
Thesagro : |
DETECCIÓN DE QTLS; MARCADORES MOLECULARES; TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04260nam a2200433 a 4500
001 1050639
005 2017-10-25
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBRANDARIZ, S.P.
245 $aEffect of using imputed missing data on QTL detection on a wheat GWAS panel.
260 $aIn: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL DE TRIGO, 2014, La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. GERMÁN, S., et al. (Org.). 1914-2014, un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela: un valioso legado para el futuro: posters; resúmenes. La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY: INIA$c2014
300 $ap. 86.
520 $aMolecular markers are an essential component of plant and animal breeding programs. One inexpensive way of obtaining molecular markers is through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is one of the NGS techniques which have been successfully used for complex genomes like wheat. A particularity of GBS is that it generates a lot of missing information which is generally imputed. Imputation is required for Genomic Prediction studies and several studies demonstrate its value. However, the effectiveness of missing data imputation for Genome-wide association (GWAS) studies has not been demonstrated. Data imputation for GWAS where one marker at a time is being studied could potentially create biased estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of using either missing or imputed data for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) detection in a wheat GWAS pannel. A set of 384 advanced lines of wheat was included in this study consisting of 186 genotypes from INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria) in Uruguay, 55 genotypes from INIA in Chile and 143 genotypes from CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo). SNPs were obtained using the Tassel-GBS Pipeline. We excluded SNPs with more than 50 % missing data and SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) more extreme than 10%. Sequence database available from the SyntheticxOpata map (synop) was used to construct the maps, obtaining a final data set with more than 18K SNPs. Missing data was handled in three different ways to create the SNP datasets used for QTL detection: 1) data not-imputed, 2) data imputed by the realized relationship matrix method multivariate normal expectation maximization (MVN-EM), and 3) data imputed by the mean. A number of QTL (either 25 or 50) with different heritability (0.2 and 0.7) were simulated on top of each dataset. The following mixed model was used to recover QTL: , where : phenotypic vector, : SNPs matrix, : unknown vector of allele effects to be estimated, : matrix that relates each measurement to population origin, : populations vector, : kinship matrix, : vector of random background polygenic effects, and : residual error. We used a liberal 0.01 significance level. The power to detect QTL was estimated for each dataset and differences among medians of QTL detection power among imputed datasets were studied using the Friedman test and non-parametric contrasts. For this purpose, methods of imputations were defined as treatments and simulation scenarios as blocks. The QTL detection power with the MVN-EM matrix was lower than with the mean imputed matrix or the no imputed matrix. No differences in QTL detection power were found between the mean imputed matrix or the no imputed matrix. Based on our results, imputing does not seem to improve QTL detection power.
650 $aDETECCIÓN DE QTLS
650 $aMARCADORES MOLECULARES
650 $aTRIGO
653 $aGBS
653 $aGENOMIC PREDICTION
653 $aGENOMIC WIDE ASSOCIATION
653 $aGENOTYPING BY SEQUENCING
653 $aGWAS
653 $aMARCADORES MOLECULARES
653 $aMULTIVARIATE NORMAL EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION
653 $aMVN-EM
653 $aNEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING
653 $aNGS
653 $aQTL
653 $aQUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI DETECTION
653 $aSINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS
653 $aSNPs
653 $aTRITICUM
700 1 $aGONZÁELZ-REYMÚNDEZ, A.
700 1 $aLADO, B.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, M.
700 1 $aVON ZITZEWITZ, J.
700 1 $aCASTRO, M.
700 1 $aMATUS, I.
700 1 $aDEL POZO, A.
700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
